Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-07-07 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a global score of 80.4, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. Although the Galaxy Note Fan Edition is newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force, it's a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has 4 more cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition and Motorola Moto Z Force feature very similar screens, because although the Motorola Moto Z Force has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density. The Motorola Moto Z Force captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto Z Force also counts with a camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Note Fan Edition, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Moto Z Force, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.