Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2017-07-07 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a score of 80.4, which is a bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 global score. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's design is noticeably thicker and somewhat heavier than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1440 x 2560px resolution, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also counts with a just a little better pixels number per inch in the screen. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a camera that's just as good as Galaxy Note Fan Edition's camera, and although the Moto Z2 Force Edition has a tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality photos and a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photography and videos, they both have a 12 mega pixels camera in the back, the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.