Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2017-07-07 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a score of 80.4, which is a bit better than Moto Z2 Play's score of 77.4. Although it's the best in this comparison review, we must tell that it's also a somewhat heavier and much thicker device. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit more powerful processor than Moto Z2 Play. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a slightly better looking display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560, a bit larger screen and more pixels per inch of screen. Moto Z2 Play features a very superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Moto Z2 Play also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a slightly better camera than Moto Z2 Play. They have the same aperture, the same resolution camera, the same video definition and the same video frame rate.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Note Fan Edition, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.