Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a score of 81.6, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's global score of 80.4. Even though the Motorola One 5G Ace is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it is notably heavier and notably thicker. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola One 5G Ace. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little sharper display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Motorola One 5G Ace has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Motorola One 5G Ace has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a same size aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution back camera.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Motorola One 5G Ace is also a bargain compared to others, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.