Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2017-07-07 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a score of 80.4, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Action's 78.5 overall score. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Note Fan Edition is much older than the Motorola One Action, it's body is thinner and just a little lighter. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little bit better looking display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a just a little better pixel amount per inch of screen.
The Motorola One Action counts with a much better storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit superior processor than Motorola One Action. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Motorola One Action counts with a camera that's just as good as the camera in Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although the Motorola One Action has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking images and video in low-light environments, they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video resolution and the same resolution back-facing camera.
The Motorola One Action features a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One Action. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Motorola One Action, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.