Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is slightly better than the Motorola One Hyper, with a general score of 80.4 against 79.8. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition design is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Motorola One Hyper, although it was released 2 years before. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Hyper. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a slightly better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Motorola One Hyper counts with a better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Motorola One Hyper has much more memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. The Motorola One Hyper features longer battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola One Hyper. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola One Hyper, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.