Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2017-07-07 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision has an overall score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 score. The Motorola One Vision is a newer cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, although it is just a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixel density and a slightly better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little faster processing unit than Motorola One Vision. They have 8 cpu cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Motorola One Vision has a very superior camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a back camera with a way better resolution.
The Motorola One Vision features a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.