Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2017-07-07 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has an overall score of 80.4, which is just a bit better than Motorola One Zoom's 80 global score. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is an noticeably older device than the Motorola One Zoom, but Samsung could make it lighter and somewhat thinner. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater pixel amount per screen inch.
Motorola One Zoom has a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 128 GB against 256 GB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Zoom. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola One Zoom features longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
The Motorola One Zoom shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same camera aperture and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Zoom also has a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it costs more money than the Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One Zoom. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola One Zoom, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.