Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2022) has a score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's overall score of 80.4. Motorola razr (2022)'s body is extremely newer and a little thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater display density.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The Motorola razr (2022) has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola razr (2022) also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola razr (2022) shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting images or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera.
The Motorola razr (2022) has a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.