Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 515 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a score of 80.4, which is slightly better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s general score of 79.2. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a lot better processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a way better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller screen. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and videos in low light environments, it also counts with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a lot better video quality.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.