Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| 2017-07-07 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a global score of 80.4, which is just a bit better than Nokia 9 PureView's score of 76.4. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a just a bit lighter device than Nokia 9 PureView, but both of them are equally thin. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Nokia 9 PureView also has more RAM memory.
Nokia 9 PureView has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a little higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a just a little higher screen pixels density. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The Nokia 9 PureView has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video and a tinier back-facing camera sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality, they both have a 12 megapixels resolution camera, the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate.
Nokia 9 PureView features just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 3320mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Galaxy Note Fan Edition is also cheaper than the Nokia 9 PureView, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.