Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 has a general score of 80.8, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 overall score. Nokia XR20's body is a lot newer, but a lot thicker and heavier than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit better looking display than Nokia XR20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Nokia XR20 features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little bit better processing power than Nokia XR20, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Nokia XR20 has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4630mAh battery size. Nokia XR20 has a better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a lot better resolution camera in the back, better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
The Nokia XR20 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.