Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Ocean |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2, with an 80.4 score against 79.7. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a somewhat lighter cellphone than OPPO Find X2, but both of them have the same thickness. OPPO Find X2 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a slightly higher 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution, a larger display and a bit greater screen pixels density.
The OPPO Find X2 has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has 8 GB more RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The OPPO Find X2 has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4200mAh battery size against 3200mAh. OPPO Find X2 shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the OPPO Find X2 also has a camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution, a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and higher video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.