Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a general score of 80.4, which is a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Neo's general score of 77.7. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Note Fan Edition is older and a little bit thicker than OPPO Find X2 Neo, it's body is still just a little bit lighter. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a larger amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.7 aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a way more MP back camera and a bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with better battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.