Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Ocean |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a global score of 83.1, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 overall score. Even though OPPO Find X2 Pro is newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it is somewhat thicker and heavier. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px, a just a little more pixels per inch of screen and a bigger display. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a lot more MP back camera, higher video frame rate and a much bigger sensor.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4260mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.