Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | -- |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | -- |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a global score of 80.4, which is a little bit better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's 77 global score. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a just a little lighter but just a bit thicker cellphone than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a same size aperture and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a very superior battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.