Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a bit better than Galaxy A22, with a score of 80.4 against 76.1. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition construction is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than Galaxy A22, although it was released 4 years before. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A22. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot better screen density and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition captures just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a much worse 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The Galaxy A22 has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A22 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a superior battery life than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.