Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting an 84.6 score against 80.4. Even though Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is incredibly newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A22 5G. Both have 8 cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater pixel quantity per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A22 5G features a way better battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. The Galaxy A22 5G features just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a way more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.