Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a little bit better than Galaxy A25 5G, having a overall score of 80.4 against 79.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition design is just a little bit thinner and lighter than the Galaxy A25 5G, even though it was released 7 years before. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a bit sharper display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a just a bit lower number of pixels per inch of display and a little worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a much greater performance than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy A25 5G has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A25 5G takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which provides a lower image and video quality and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy A25 5G features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.