Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, having a overall score of 91.3 against 80.4. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G body is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's, although it's a little bit thicker and heavier. Galaxy A52 5G's CPU is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition one, and although the Galaxy A52 5G has a larger amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater display pixel density. Galaxy A52 5G features a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A52 5G shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a lot larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 41% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.