Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with a score of 88.1 against 80.4. The Galaxy F62 body is incredibly newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's, although it is extremely heavier and thicker. Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better display density.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a processing unit that's very similar to the processor in Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although the Samsung Galaxy F62 has a lower number of cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy F62 counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.