Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's overall score of 80.4. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is noticeably newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's, but it's just a little thicker and heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little bit inferior pixel number in each inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and a bigger display. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much better video quality, a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with way more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.