Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting an 89.7 score against 80.4. The Galaxy S10 Lite design is a lot newer than Galaxy Note Fan Edition's, but it's just a little bit thicker and heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy S10 Lite shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with better 60 fps video frame rates, a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera and a bigger sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.