Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with a global score of 94.8 against 80.4. The Samsung Galaxy S20 is a a bit lighter phone than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but both are equally thin. Samsung Galaxy S20 features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a little bit better screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a just a little more pixels per display inch, a bit larger display and a slightly higher 1440 x 3200 resolution. Galaxy S20 has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos, and they both have a back facing camera with a 12 MP, the Galaxy S20 also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a lot larger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos.
Galaxy S20 has much more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 features superior battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 is way more expensive than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.