Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with a 90.8 score against 80.4. Even though Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a lot newer than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it is heavier and a little thicker. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels number per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S20 FE has a much greater memory for applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera with a 12 mega-pixels, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a way larger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and higher video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Galaxy S20 FE not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.