Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is much better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 score. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is incredibly newer than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's, but it's a lot heavier and somewhat thicker. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a just a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 3200px resolution and a larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures greater videos and photos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photographs or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot higher video definition, a larger camera sensor and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has more internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 56% more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.