Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a score of 93.4, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S22 construction weights the same than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it's just a little thinner. Galaxy S22 features a little bit better performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S22 features a sharper screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit larger display. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a slightly better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 16 percent more battery size. Galaxy S22 shoots way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot larger sensor taking much higher quality photographs, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back camera with a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 costs more money than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.