Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-07-07 | -- |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.89 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a bit better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting an 82.6 score against 80.4. The Samsung Galaxy S25 construction is way thinner and incredibly lighter than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Galaxy S25 counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite worse pixels density, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with an extremely better CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs, a way better video definition and a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little bit better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 256 GB. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is more expensive than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy Note Fan Edition. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.