Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's overall score of 80.4. Galaxy XCover Pro's construction is incredibly newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's, although it is notably thicker and a lot heavier. Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better display density.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition and the Galaxy XCover Pro feature very similar processing units, both have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same video frame rates, the same aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
The Galaxy XCover Pro not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.