Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, having an 88.5 score against 80.4. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it's a little thinner and notably newer. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a little better pixel density. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Z Flip features a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 3 percent larger battery size. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which provides a lower image and video quality and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same resolution camera, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also counts with higher video frame rate.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy Note Fan Edition. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Galaxy Note Fan Edition, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.