Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's global score of 80.4. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is notably newer and a little bit thinner, but a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch and a slightly better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier sensor offering a worse image quality and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same resolution back camera and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much greater memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 3% more battery size.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.