Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.57 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, having a 90.6 score against 80.4. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a a lot newer and somewhat thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it's also much heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 8 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2560, it also counts with a better screen density. Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a way larger camera aperture to capture better low light photography.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.