Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Blasting black |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much better than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting a 90.1 score against 80.4. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro construction is way newer, but way heavier and way thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a display that's just as good as the Galaxy Note Fan Edition one, because although the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a larger display.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light images and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with faster video frame rates, a much larger back-facing camera sensor and a camera in the back with a lot higher 64 MP resolution.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a superior battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.