Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-10-13 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4820mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with a overall score of 81.2 against 80.4. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite is a extremely newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, although it's thicker and incredibly heavier. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite's processing unit is just as good as the processor in Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has a greater amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite features a bit better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite also counts with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back camera and a much bigger sensor shooting way better quality photos.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite features a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4820mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.