Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| 2017-07-07 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Black, Blue and Green |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting a overall score of 83.8 against 80.4. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's construction is newer, but incredibly heavier and a bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition and the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 both feature really similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a bit lower pixels density and a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier camera sensor and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with a more megapixels camera in the back and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a battery lifetime that is just as good as the battery lifetime in Galaxy Note Fan Edition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.