Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a score of 84.3, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 score. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's construction is newer and way thinner than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's, but it is also much heavier. Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a much more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a sharper screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a just a little lower display pixel density, it also counts with a higher 2224 x 2488px resolution and a much bigger display. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 shoots greater videos and photos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also has a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels, a much higher video definition and a much bigger sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a much better battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.