Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-05-09 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with an 80.6 score against 80.4. Even though the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is notably newer than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it's somewhat thicker and heavier. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite's processing unit is very similar to Galaxy Note Fan Edition's CPU, and although the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a display that's very similar to Galaxy Note Fan Edition's display, because although the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little larger display. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 64 MP resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality photos and videos.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 256 GB. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 64 percent larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.