Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 global score. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it is extremely heavier and somewhat thicker. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit better CPU than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way better video resolution, a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.