Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-07-14 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a score of 80.4, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's general score of 78.7. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is an extremely older device than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, but Samsung made it way lighter and thinner. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition count with extremely similar processing units, both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater pixel density. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a little bit more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.