Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-03-20 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is a bit better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, having a score of 83.4 against 80.4. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro construction is a lot newer, but somewhat thicker and much heavier than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also counts with a camera with a way better 48 megapixels resolution and a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.