Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, with an 80.4 score against 78.3. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's construction is a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, even though it was released many years before. Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a little sharper display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bit larger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photographs or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a bigger sensor taking higher quality pictures and videos and a camera with lot more megapixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has just a bit more memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 56 percent larger battery size.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.