Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-05-26 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, getting a overall score of 80.4 against 79.5. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is an incredibly older cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, but it's thinner and lighter anyway. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher screen pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. Both of them have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a larger sensor shooting better quality photographs and videos and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G features a superior battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 56% larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.