Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, having a overall score of 82.4 against 80.4. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's body is noticeably newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's, although it is somewhat heavier and just a little thicker. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a larger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a little bit better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a way better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing images in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a camera with way more MP.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 57% larger battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.