Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-04-28 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, having a general score of 80.4 against 78.2. Despite of the fact that Galaxy Note Fan Edition is way older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, it's construction is a bit thinner and a little bit lighter. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a slightly better screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit worse amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite larger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has much more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a very superior battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.