Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | -- |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is slightly better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with an 86.1 score against 80.4. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a a bit thicker and heavier cellphone than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a little bit worse 1440 x 2560 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen pixels density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has just a little better performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a camera with a much better resolution.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition features slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a way better battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.