Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2017-07-07 | 2018-02-22 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has an overall score of 80.4, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro's global score of 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition body is a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, although both were only released with a few months difference.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with just a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, and although they both have the same resolution camera, the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a much larger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in low light environments and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has greater battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.