Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's score of 80.4. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body is a lot newer than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's, although it's thicker and extremely heavier. Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little bit better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit better CPU than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much larger camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos and a back facing camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.