Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has an overall score of 83, which is a bit better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition's global score of 80.4. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is a incredibly newer cellphone than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, although it is somewhat heavier and thicker. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better count of pixels per inch of screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a way better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a bigger sensor which offers a higher image and video quality and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with slightly more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.