Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a global score of 80.4, which is just a bit better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's overall score of 78.1. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition construction has the same thickness than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but it is lighter. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 44 percent larger battery capacity. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a larger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments, a camera with way more MP and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is also by far the cheapest one, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.