Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note II
AT&TSGH-I317
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-09-19 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.94 x 3.17 x 0.37 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.34 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is just a bit better than Galaxy Note II, having a 78.8 score against 71.9. The Google Pixel 3a is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Galaxy Note II. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 3a has a newer 11 version and Galaxy Note II has Android 4.3, providing you some extra features.
The Google Pixel 3a has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note II, because it has a way greater display pixel density, a little larger screen and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels. The Galaxy Note II counts with a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
Google Pixel 3a captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note II, because it has a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a lot higher (4K) video resolution. The Google Pixel 3a features a much bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note II, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Note II features a little better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3 percent more battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Google Pixel 3a is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.